Preview

Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems

Advanced search

Data Rates Assessment on L2–L3 CPU Bus and Bus between CPU and RAM in Modern CPUs

https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2017-4-434-444

Abstract

In this paper, a modern CPU architecture with several different cache levels is described, and current CPU performance limitations such as silicone physical limitations or frequency increase bounds are mentioned. As usual, changes of the currently existing architecture are proposed as a way of increasing CPU performance, data rates on the internal and external CPU interfaces must be known. It would help to assess applicability of proposed solutions and allow to optimize them. This paper is aimed at getting real values of traffic on L2-L3 cache interface inside CPU and CPU-RAM bus load as well as show dependencies of total traffic on the interfaces of interest on the number of active cores, CPU frequency and test type. Measurements methodology using Intel Performance Counter Monitor by Intel is provided and equations that allow to get data rates from internal CPU counters are explained. Both real life and synthetic tests are described. Dependency of total traffic on the number of active cores and dependency of total traffic on CPU frequency are provided as plots. Dependency of total traffic on test type provided as bar plot for multiple CPU frequencies.

About the Author

Maria S. Komar
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University; Tampere University of Technology
Finland

PhD student;

MSc student



References

1. Peter J. Denning, Ted G. Lewis, “Exponential Laws of Computing Growth”, Communications of the ACM, 60:1 (2017), 54–65.

2. Intel Corporation, “7th gen intel core and Intel Xeon processor briefing”, https://newsroom.intel.com/newsroom/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2017/01/7thgen-intel-core-january-product-brief.pdf.

3. Thomas Walther, “Scaling through more cores. From single to multi core”, https://wr.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/ media/teaching/wintersemester 2015 2016/nthr- 16-walther-scaling through more cores-ausarbeitung.pdf.

4. Li X., “Survey of Wireless Network-on-Chip Systems”, http://www.eng.auburn.edu/ agrawvd/THESIS/LI/report.pdf.

5. Ganguly A., Deb S., Belzer B., “Scalable hybrid wireless network-on-chip architectures for multicore systems”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 60:10 (2011), 1485–1502.

6. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., “AMD desktop processor solutions”, “AMD desktop processor solutions”, www.amd.com.

7. Intel Corporation, www.intel.com.

8. Intel Corporation, “Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual”, https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/39/c5/325462-sdm-vol-1-2abcd- 3abcd.pdf.

9. Kubuntu devs, “Kubuntu 14.10”, www.kubuntu.org/news/kubuntu-14.10.

10. Intel Corporation, “Intel Performance Counter Monitor”, www.intel.com/software/pcm.

11. Daemen J., Rijmen V., “AES Proposal: Rijndael”, 1999.

12. Total Annihilation Universe, “Total Annihilation Universe”, www.tauniverse.com


Review

For citations:


Komar M.S. Data Rates Assessment on L2–L3 CPU Bus and Bus between CPU and RAM in Modern CPUs. Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems. 2017;24(4):434-444. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2017-4-434-444

Views: 874


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-1015 (Print)
ISSN 2313-5417 (Online)