Preview

Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems

Advanced search

Software-Defined Networks as a Stage of the Network Technology Evolution

https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2013-4-110-124

Abstract

The authors of the article focus on the concept of a software defined network. In the beginning, the brief historical account is given concerning software defined networks as a scientific concept, its formation and technological and scientific meaning. The software defined network concept is treated in the article not as the final state-of-the-art in networking, but rather as a possible step and direction in the development of a networking paradigm. The article touches on pros and cons as well of the software defined networking and gives an account of possible stages of development of this technology in the context of other technologies, considering its hybrid with MPLS, as an example. OpenFlow protocol constitutes the main part of the article. The authors further discuss various kinds of existing libraries realizing programmable management routines for a software defined network using OpenFlow. All of these libraries provide API for building modular applications for software defined network management. Touching on practical side of implementation the results of comparative tests of throughput and latency, achieved with these libraries are shown.

About the Authors

A. A. Krasotin
Energiya-Info LLC
Russian Federation

технический руководитель,

Soyuznaya str., 144, Yaroslavl, 150008, Russia



I. V. Alexseev
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Russian Federation

канд. физ.-мат. наук, директор Университетского Центра Интернет,

Sovetskaya str., 14, Yaroslavl, 150000, Russia



References

1. OpenFlow Switch Specification, Version 1.1.0 Implemented // www.openflow.org/documents/openflow-spec-v1.1.0.pdf

2. OpenFlow white paper // www.archive.openflow.org/documents/openflow-wp-latest.pdf

3. McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G., Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J. OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks // SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. March 2008. Vol. 38. P. 69–74.

4. Koponen T., Casado M., Gude N., Stribling J., Poutievski L., Zhu M., Ramanathan R., Iwata Y., Inoue H., Hama T. Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks. OSDI, 2010

5. Canini M., Venzano D., Peresini P., Kostic D., Rexford J. A NICE Way to Test OpenFlow Applications // NSDI, 2012.

6. Rotsos C., Sarrar N., Uhlig S., Sherwood R., Moore A. W. OFLOPS: An Open Framework for OpenFlow Switch Evaluation // PAM, 2012.

7. Kazemian P., Varghese G., McKeown N. Header Space Analysis: Static Checking For Networks // NSDI, 2012.

8. Khurshid, W. Zhou, M. Caesar, P. B. Godfrey VeriFlow: Verifying Network-Wide Invariants in Real Time // HotSDN, 2012.

9. Bosshart Р., Gibb G., Kim Hun-Seok, Varghese G., McKeown N., Izzard M., Mujica F., Horowitz M. Forwarding Metamorphosis: Fast Programmable Match-Action Processing in Hardware for SDN // SIGCOMM ’13: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM. P. 99–110.

10. Casado M., Koponen T., Shenker S., Tootoonchian A. Fabric: a retrospective on evolving SDN // HotSDN ’12: Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks, 2012.


Review

For citations:


Krasotin A.A., Alexseev I.V. Software-Defined Networks as a Stage of the Network Technology Evolution. Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems. 2013;20(4):110-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2013-4-110-124

Views: 1140


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-1015 (Print)
ISSN 2313-5417 (Online)