Performance Analysis of the Transport Protocols Trickles and TCP under High-load Network Conditions
https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2012-4-37-47
Abstract
We study the performance of the Trickles protocol which is a transport-layer protocol for the TCP/IP architecture. We have implemented the original model of the Trickles protocol for the ns-2 simulator and defined performance metrics which were measured using ns-2 simulations.
About the Authors
M. A. Nikitinskiy
Ярославский государственный университет им. П.Г. Демидова
Russian Federation
аспирант
Russian Federation
аспирант
D. Ju. Chalyy
Ярославский государственный университет им. П.Г. Демидова
Russian Federation
канд. физ.-мат. наук, доцент
Russian Federation
канд. физ.-мат. наук, доцент
References
1. Shieh, A., Myers, A. C., Sirer, E. G. A stateless approach to connection-oriented protocols // ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 26, 3, Article 8 (September 2008), 50 pages.
2. Transmission Control Protocol. DARPA Internet Program. Protocol Specification // RFC793,September, 1981. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
3. Jacobson V., Braden R., Borman D. TCP Extensions for High Performance // RFC1323,May, 1992. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
4. Mathis M., Mahdavi J., Floyd S., Romanow A. TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options // RFC2018, October, 1996. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
5. Allman M., Paxson V., Stevens W. TCP Congestion Control // RFC2581, April, 1999. Website: www.rfc-editor.org
6. Floyd S., Mahdavi J., Mathis M., Podolsky M. An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP // RFC2883, July, 2000. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
7. Paxson V., Allman M. Computing TCP’s Retransmission Timer // RFC2988, November, 2000. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
8. Allman M., Balakrishnan H., Floyd S. Enhancing TCP’s Loss Recovery Using Limited Transmit // RFC3042, January, 2001. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
9. Allman M., Floyd S., Partridge C. Increasing TCP’s Initial Window // RFC3390, October,2002. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
10. Floyd S., Henderson T., Gurtov A. The NewReno Modification to TCP’s Fast Recovery Algorithm // RFC3782, April, 2004. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
11. V. Paxson, M. Allman, J. Chu, M. Sargent. Computing TCP’s Retransmission Timer // RFC6298, June, 2011. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
12. J. Touch, A. Mankin, R. Bonica. The TCP Authentication Option // RFC5925, June, 2010. Web site: www.rfc-editor.org
13. K. Fall, S. Floyd. Simulation-based comparisons of Tahoe, Reno and SACK TCP // Computer Communications Review, Vol. 26, Issue 3, July, 1996, p. 5–21.
14. S. Low, L. Peterson, L. Wang. Understanding TCP Vegas: A Duality Model // Tech. Rep. TR-628-00, Princeton University, November, 2000, 22 pages.
15. S. McCanne and S. Floyd. ns Network Simulator // http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
16. Jain R. The art of computer systems performance analysis. // Jon Wiley and Sons, 1991.
17. D.Ju. Chaly, V.A. Sokolov. An Extensible Coloured Petri Net Model of a Transport Protocol for Packet Switched Networks // Proceedings of PACT’2003, LNCS Vol. 2763, Springer, 2003. p. 66–75
Review
For citations:
Nikitinskiy M.A., Chalyy D.J. Performance Analysis of the Transport Protocols Trickles and TCP under High-load Network Conditions. Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems. 2012;19(4):37-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2012-4-37-47
Views:
855
Email this article 